style: format all files with prettier

This commit is contained in:
Seth Hobson
2026-01-19 17:07:03 -05:00
parent 8d37048deb
commit 56848874a2
355 changed files with 15215 additions and 10241 deletions

View File

@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ Analyze industry attractiveness and competitive intensity.
### Force 1: Threat of New Entrants
**Barriers to Entry:**
- Capital requirements
- Economies of scale
- Switching costs
@@ -31,6 +32,7 @@ Analyze industry attractiveness and competitive intensity.
**Low Threat:** High barriers (e.g., regulated industries, hardware)
**Analysis Questions:**
- How easy is it for new competitors to enter?
- What would it cost to launch a competing product?
- Are there network effects or switching costs protecting incumbents?
@@ -38,6 +40,7 @@ Analyze industry attractiveness and competitive intensity.
### Force 2: Bargaining Power of Suppliers
**Supplier Power Factors:**
- Supplier concentration
- Availability of substitutes
- Importance to supplier
@@ -48,6 +51,7 @@ Analyze industry attractiveness and competitive intensity.
**Low Power:** Many alternatives, commoditized (e.g., generic services)
**Analysis Questions:**
- Who are our critical suppliers?
- Could they raise prices or reduce quality?
- Can we switch suppliers easily?
@@ -55,6 +59,7 @@ Analyze industry attractiveness and competitive intensity.
### Force 3: Bargaining Power of Buyers
**Buyer Power Factors:**
- Buyer concentration
- Volume purchased
- Product differentiation
@@ -65,6 +70,7 @@ Analyze industry attractiveness and competitive intensity.
**Low Power:** Many small customers, differentiated product (e.g., consumer subscriptions)
**Analysis Questions:**
- Can customers easily switch to competitors?
- Do few customers generate most revenue?
- How price-sensitive are buyers?
@@ -72,6 +78,7 @@ Analyze industry attractiveness and competitive intensity.
### Force 4: Threat of Substitutes
**Substitute Considerations:**
- Alternative solutions
- Price-performance tradeoff
- Switching costs
@@ -81,6 +88,7 @@ Analyze industry attractiveness and competitive intensity.
**Low Threat:** Unique solution, high switching cost (e.g., ERP systems)
**Analysis Questions:**
- What alternative ways can customers solve this problem?
- How do substitutes compare on price and performance?
- What's the cost to switch to a substitute?
@@ -88,6 +96,7 @@ Analyze industry attractiveness and competitive intensity.
### Force 5: Competitive Rivalry
**Rivalry Intensity Factors:**
- Number of competitors
- Industry growth rate
- Product differentiation
@@ -98,6 +107,7 @@ Analyze industry attractiveness and competitive intensity.
**Low Rivalry:** Few competitors, fast growth, differentiated (e.g., emerging AI tools)
**Analysis Questions:**
- How many direct competitors exist?
- Is the market growing or stagnant?
- How differentiated are offerings?
@@ -107,13 +117,13 @@ Analyze industry attractiveness and competitive intensity.
Create a scorecard:
| Force | Intensity (1-5) | Impact | Key Factors |
|-------|-----------------|--------|-------------|
| New Entrants | 3 | Medium | Low barriers but network effects |
| Supplier Power | 2 | Low | Many cloud providers |
| Buyer Power | 4 | High | Enterprise customers concentrated |
| Substitutes | 3 | Medium | Manual processes alternative |
| Rivalry | 4 | High | 10+ direct competitors |
| Force | Intensity (1-5) | Impact | Key Factors |
| -------------- | --------------- | ------ | --------------------------------- |
| New Entrants | 3 | Medium | Low barriers but network effects |
| Supplier Power | 2 | Low | Many cloud providers |
| Buyer Power | 4 | High | Enterprise customers concentrated |
| Substitutes | 3 | Medium | Manual processes alternative |
| Rivalry | 4 | High | 10+ direct competitors |
**Overall Assessment:** Moderate industry attractiveness with high rivalry and buyer power
@@ -160,6 +170,7 @@ Budget Hotel Strategy:
Find the sweet spot: Lower cost + higher value
**Steps:**
1. Map industry competing factors
2. Identify factors to eliminate/reduce (cost savings)
3. Identify factors to raise/create (differentiation)
@@ -172,6 +183,7 @@ Find the sweet spot: Lower cost + higher value
Plot competitors on 2-3 key dimensions.
**Example Dimensions:**
- Price vs. Features
- Complexity vs. Ease of Use
- Enterprise vs. SMB Focus
@@ -179,12 +191,14 @@ Plot competitors on 2-3 key dimensions.
- Generalist vs. Specialist
**How to Create:**
1. Choose 2 dimensions most important to customers
2. Plot all competitors
3. Identify gaps (white space)
4. Validate gap represents real customer need
**Example:**
```
High Price
|
@@ -238,6 +252,7 @@ Our product [statement of primary differentiation]
```
**Example:**
```
For e-commerce companies
Who struggle with email marketing automation
@@ -252,6 +267,7 @@ Our product uses AI to personalize at scale
### Information Gathering
**Public Sources:**
- Company websites and blogs
- Press releases and news
- Job postings (hint at strategy)
@@ -262,6 +278,7 @@ Our product uses AI to personalize at scale
- Patent filings
**Direct Research:**
- Customer interviews
- Win/loss analysis
- Sales team feedback
@@ -273,11 +290,13 @@ Our product uses AI to personalize at scale
For each key competitor, document:
**Company Overview:**
- Founded, HQ, funding, size
- Leadership team
- Company stage and trajectory
**Product:**
- Core features
- Target customers
- Pricing and packaging
@@ -285,22 +304,26 @@ For each key competitor, document:
- Recent launches
**Go-to-Market:**
- Sales model (self-serve, sales-led)
- Marketing strategy
- Distribution channels
- Partnerships
**Strengths:**
- What they do better than anyone
- Key competitive advantages
- Market position
**Weaknesses:**
- Gaps in product
- Customer complaints
- Operational challenges
**Strategy:**
- Stated direction
- Inferred priorities
- Likely next moves
@@ -310,18 +333,21 @@ For each key competitor, document:
### Price Positioning
**Premium (Top 25%):**
- Superior product/service
- Strong brand
- High-touch sales
- Enterprise focus
**Mid-Market (Middle 50%):**
- Balanced value
- Standard features
- Mixed sales model
- Broad market
**Value (Bottom 25%):**
- Basic functionality
- Self-service
- Cost leadership
@@ -329,13 +355,14 @@ For each key competitor, document:
### Pricing Comparison Matrix
| Competitor | Entry Price | Mid Tier | Enterprise | Model |
|-----------|-------------|----------|------------|-------|
| Competitor A | $29/mo | $99/mo | Custom | Subscription |
| Competitor B | $49/mo | $199/mo | $499/mo | Subscription |
| Us | $39/mo | $129/mo | Custom | Subscription |
| Competitor | Entry Price | Mid Tier | Enterprise | Model |
| ------------ | ----------- | -------- | ---------- | ------------ |
| Competitor A | $29/mo | $99/mo | Custom | Subscription |
| Competitor B | $49/mo | $199/mo | $499/mo | Subscription |
| Us | $39/mo | $129/mo | Custom | Subscription |
**Analysis:**
- Are we priced competitively?
- What does our pricing signal?
- Are there gaps in our packaging?
@@ -345,21 +372,25 @@ For each key competitor, document:
### Market Entry Strategies
**Direct Competition:**
- Head-to-head against established players
- Requires differentiation and resources
- Example: Better features at lower price
**Niche Focus:**
- Target underserved segment
- Become specialist vs. generalist
- Example: "Salesforce for real estate"
**Disruptive Innovation:**
- Target non-consumers or low end
- Improve over time to move upmarket
- Example: Freemium model disrupting enterprise
**Platform Play:**
- Build ecosystem and network effects
- Aggregate complementary services
- Example: Marketplace or API platform
@@ -367,6 +398,7 @@ For each key competitor, document:
### Beachhead Market
**Characteristics of Good Beachhead:**
- Specific, reachable segment
- Acute pain you solve well
- Limited competition
@@ -381,32 +413,39 @@ Instead of "project management software", target "project management for constru
### Sustainable Advantages
**Network Effects:**
- Value increases with users
- Example: Slack, marketplaces
**Switching Costs:**
- High cost to change
- Example: CRM systems with data
**Economies of Scale:**
- Unit costs decrease with volume
- Example: Cloud infrastructure
**Brand:**
- Trust and reputation
- Example: Security software
**Proprietary Technology:**
- Patents or trade secrets
- Example: Algorithms, data
**Regulatory:**
- Licenses or approvals
- Example: Fintech, healthcare
### Testing Your Advantage
Ask:
- Can competitors copy this in < 2 years?
- Does this matter to customers?
- Do we execute this better than anyone?
@@ -419,17 +458,20 @@ If "no" to any, it's not a sustainable advantage.
### What to Track
**Product Changes:**
- New features
- Pricing changes
- Packaging adjustments
**Market Signals:**
- Funding announcements
- Key hires (especially leadership)
- Customer wins/losses
- Partnerships
**Performance Metrics:**
- Revenue (if public or disclosed)
- Customer count
- Growth rate
@@ -438,28 +480,34 @@ If "no" to any, it's not a sustainable advantage.
### Monitoring Cadence
**Weekly:**
- Product release notes
- News mentions
**Monthly:**
- Win/loss analysis review
- Positioning map updates
**Quarterly:**
- Deep competitive review
- Strategy adjustment
**Annually:**
- Major strategy reassessment
- Market trends analysis
## Additional Resources
### Reference Files
- **`references/frameworks-deep-dive.md`** - Detailed application of each framework with worksheets
- **`references/intel-sources.md`** - Comprehensive list of competitive intelligence sources
### Example Files
- **`examples/competitor-analysis.md`** - Complete competitive analysis for a SaaS startup
- **`examples/positioning-workshop.md`** - Step-by-step positioning development process