mirror of
https://github.com/wshobson/agents.git
synced 2026-03-18 17:47:16 +00:00
style: format all files with prettier
This commit is contained in:
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ Analyze industry attractiveness and competitive intensity.
|
||||
### Force 1: Threat of New Entrants
|
||||
|
||||
**Barriers to Entry:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Capital requirements
|
||||
- Economies of scale
|
||||
- Switching costs
|
||||
@@ -31,6 +32,7 @@ Analyze industry attractiveness and competitive intensity.
|
||||
**Low Threat:** High barriers (e.g., regulated industries, hardware)
|
||||
|
||||
**Analysis Questions:**
|
||||
|
||||
- How easy is it for new competitors to enter?
|
||||
- What would it cost to launch a competing product?
|
||||
- Are there network effects or switching costs protecting incumbents?
|
||||
@@ -38,6 +40,7 @@ Analyze industry attractiveness and competitive intensity.
|
||||
### Force 2: Bargaining Power of Suppliers
|
||||
|
||||
**Supplier Power Factors:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Supplier concentration
|
||||
- Availability of substitutes
|
||||
- Importance to supplier
|
||||
@@ -48,6 +51,7 @@ Analyze industry attractiveness and competitive intensity.
|
||||
**Low Power:** Many alternatives, commoditized (e.g., generic services)
|
||||
|
||||
**Analysis Questions:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Who are our critical suppliers?
|
||||
- Could they raise prices or reduce quality?
|
||||
- Can we switch suppliers easily?
|
||||
@@ -55,6 +59,7 @@ Analyze industry attractiveness and competitive intensity.
|
||||
### Force 3: Bargaining Power of Buyers
|
||||
|
||||
**Buyer Power Factors:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Buyer concentration
|
||||
- Volume purchased
|
||||
- Product differentiation
|
||||
@@ -65,6 +70,7 @@ Analyze industry attractiveness and competitive intensity.
|
||||
**Low Power:** Many small customers, differentiated product (e.g., consumer subscriptions)
|
||||
|
||||
**Analysis Questions:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Can customers easily switch to competitors?
|
||||
- Do few customers generate most revenue?
|
||||
- How price-sensitive are buyers?
|
||||
@@ -72,6 +78,7 @@ Analyze industry attractiveness and competitive intensity.
|
||||
### Force 4: Threat of Substitutes
|
||||
|
||||
**Substitute Considerations:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Alternative solutions
|
||||
- Price-performance tradeoff
|
||||
- Switching costs
|
||||
@@ -81,6 +88,7 @@ Analyze industry attractiveness and competitive intensity.
|
||||
**Low Threat:** Unique solution, high switching cost (e.g., ERP systems)
|
||||
|
||||
**Analysis Questions:**
|
||||
|
||||
- What alternative ways can customers solve this problem?
|
||||
- How do substitutes compare on price and performance?
|
||||
- What's the cost to switch to a substitute?
|
||||
@@ -88,6 +96,7 @@ Analyze industry attractiveness and competitive intensity.
|
||||
### Force 5: Competitive Rivalry
|
||||
|
||||
**Rivalry Intensity Factors:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Number of competitors
|
||||
- Industry growth rate
|
||||
- Product differentiation
|
||||
@@ -98,6 +107,7 @@ Analyze industry attractiveness and competitive intensity.
|
||||
**Low Rivalry:** Few competitors, fast growth, differentiated (e.g., emerging AI tools)
|
||||
|
||||
**Analysis Questions:**
|
||||
|
||||
- How many direct competitors exist?
|
||||
- Is the market growing or stagnant?
|
||||
- How differentiated are offerings?
|
||||
@@ -107,13 +117,13 @@ Analyze industry attractiveness and competitive intensity.
|
||||
|
||||
Create a scorecard:
|
||||
|
||||
| Force | Intensity (1-5) | Impact | Key Factors |
|
||||
|-------|-----------------|--------|-------------|
|
||||
| New Entrants | 3 | Medium | Low barriers but network effects |
|
||||
| Supplier Power | 2 | Low | Many cloud providers |
|
||||
| Buyer Power | 4 | High | Enterprise customers concentrated |
|
||||
| Substitutes | 3 | Medium | Manual processes alternative |
|
||||
| Rivalry | 4 | High | 10+ direct competitors |
|
||||
| Force | Intensity (1-5) | Impact | Key Factors |
|
||||
| -------------- | --------------- | ------ | --------------------------------- |
|
||||
| New Entrants | 3 | Medium | Low barriers but network effects |
|
||||
| Supplier Power | 2 | Low | Many cloud providers |
|
||||
| Buyer Power | 4 | High | Enterprise customers concentrated |
|
||||
| Substitutes | 3 | Medium | Manual processes alternative |
|
||||
| Rivalry | 4 | High | 10+ direct competitors |
|
||||
|
||||
**Overall Assessment:** Moderate industry attractiveness with high rivalry and buyer power
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -160,6 +170,7 @@ Budget Hotel Strategy:
|
||||
Find the sweet spot: Lower cost + higher value
|
||||
|
||||
**Steps:**
|
||||
|
||||
1. Map industry competing factors
|
||||
2. Identify factors to eliminate/reduce (cost savings)
|
||||
3. Identify factors to raise/create (differentiation)
|
||||
@@ -172,6 +183,7 @@ Find the sweet spot: Lower cost + higher value
|
||||
Plot competitors on 2-3 key dimensions.
|
||||
|
||||
**Example Dimensions:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Price vs. Features
|
||||
- Complexity vs. Ease of Use
|
||||
- Enterprise vs. SMB Focus
|
||||
@@ -179,12 +191,14 @@ Plot competitors on 2-3 key dimensions.
|
||||
- Generalist vs. Specialist
|
||||
|
||||
**How to Create:**
|
||||
|
||||
1. Choose 2 dimensions most important to customers
|
||||
2. Plot all competitors
|
||||
3. Identify gaps (white space)
|
||||
4. Validate gap represents real customer need
|
||||
|
||||
**Example:**
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
High Price
|
||||
|
|
||||
@@ -238,6 +252,7 @@ Our product [statement of primary differentiation]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Example:**
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
For e-commerce companies
|
||||
Who struggle with email marketing automation
|
||||
@@ -252,6 +267,7 @@ Our product uses AI to personalize at scale
|
||||
### Information Gathering
|
||||
|
||||
**Public Sources:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Company websites and blogs
|
||||
- Press releases and news
|
||||
- Job postings (hint at strategy)
|
||||
@@ -262,6 +278,7 @@ Our product uses AI to personalize at scale
|
||||
- Patent filings
|
||||
|
||||
**Direct Research:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Customer interviews
|
||||
- Win/loss analysis
|
||||
- Sales team feedback
|
||||
@@ -273,11 +290,13 @@ Our product uses AI to personalize at scale
|
||||
For each key competitor, document:
|
||||
|
||||
**Company Overview:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Founded, HQ, funding, size
|
||||
- Leadership team
|
||||
- Company stage and trajectory
|
||||
|
||||
**Product:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Core features
|
||||
- Target customers
|
||||
- Pricing and packaging
|
||||
@@ -285,22 +304,26 @@ For each key competitor, document:
|
||||
- Recent launches
|
||||
|
||||
**Go-to-Market:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Sales model (self-serve, sales-led)
|
||||
- Marketing strategy
|
||||
- Distribution channels
|
||||
- Partnerships
|
||||
|
||||
**Strengths:**
|
||||
|
||||
- What they do better than anyone
|
||||
- Key competitive advantages
|
||||
- Market position
|
||||
|
||||
**Weaknesses:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Gaps in product
|
||||
- Customer complaints
|
||||
- Operational challenges
|
||||
|
||||
**Strategy:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Stated direction
|
||||
- Inferred priorities
|
||||
- Likely next moves
|
||||
@@ -310,18 +333,21 @@ For each key competitor, document:
|
||||
### Price Positioning
|
||||
|
||||
**Premium (Top 25%):**
|
||||
|
||||
- Superior product/service
|
||||
- Strong brand
|
||||
- High-touch sales
|
||||
- Enterprise focus
|
||||
|
||||
**Mid-Market (Middle 50%):**
|
||||
|
||||
- Balanced value
|
||||
- Standard features
|
||||
- Mixed sales model
|
||||
- Broad market
|
||||
|
||||
**Value (Bottom 25%):**
|
||||
|
||||
- Basic functionality
|
||||
- Self-service
|
||||
- Cost leadership
|
||||
@@ -329,13 +355,14 @@ For each key competitor, document:
|
||||
|
||||
### Pricing Comparison Matrix
|
||||
|
||||
| Competitor | Entry Price | Mid Tier | Enterprise | Model |
|
||||
|-----------|-------------|----------|------------|-------|
|
||||
| Competitor A | $29/mo | $99/mo | Custom | Subscription |
|
||||
| Competitor B | $49/mo | $199/mo | $499/mo | Subscription |
|
||||
| Us | $39/mo | $129/mo | Custom | Subscription |
|
||||
| Competitor | Entry Price | Mid Tier | Enterprise | Model |
|
||||
| ------------ | ----------- | -------- | ---------- | ------------ |
|
||||
| Competitor A | $29/mo | $99/mo | Custom | Subscription |
|
||||
| Competitor B | $49/mo | $199/mo | $499/mo | Subscription |
|
||||
| Us | $39/mo | $129/mo | Custom | Subscription |
|
||||
|
||||
**Analysis:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Are we priced competitively?
|
||||
- What does our pricing signal?
|
||||
- Are there gaps in our packaging?
|
||||
@@ -345,21 +372,25 @@ For each key competitor, document:
|
||||
### Market Entry Strategies
|
||||
|
||||
**Direct Competition:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Head-to-head against established players
|
||||
- Requires differentiation and resources
|
||||
- Example: Better features at lower price
|
||||
|
||||
**Niche Focus:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Target underserved segment
|
||||
- Become specialist vs. generalist
|
||||
- Example: "Salesforce for real estate"
|
||||
|
||||
**Disruptive Innovation:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Target non-consumers or low end
|
||||
- Improve over time to move upmarket
|
||||
- Example: Freemium model disrupting enterprise
|
||||
|
||||
**Platform Play:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Build ecosystem and network effects
|
||||
- Aggregate complementary services
|
||||
- Example: Marketplace or API platform
|
||||
@@ -367,6 +398,7 @@ For each key competitor, document:
|
||||
### Beachhead Market
|
||||
|
||||
**Characteristics of Good Beachhead:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Specific, reachable segment
|
||||
- Acute pain you solve well
|
||||
- Limited competition
|
||||
@@ -381,32 +413,39 @@ Instead of "project management software", target "project management for constru
|
||||
### Sustainable Advantages
|
||||
|
||||
**Network Effects:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Value increases with users
|
||||
- Example: Slack, marketplaces
|
||||
|
||||
**Switching Costs:**
|
||||
|
||||
- High cost to change
|
||||
- Example: CRM systems with data
|
||||
|
||||
**Economies of Scale:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Unit costs decrease with volume
|
||||
- Example: Cloud infrastructure
|
||||
|
||||
**Brand:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Trust and reputation
|
||||
- Example: Security software
|
||||
|
||||
**Proprietary Technology:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Patents or trade secrets
|
||||
- Example: Algorithms, data
|
||||
|
||||
**Regulatory:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Licenses or approvals
|
||||
- Example: Fintech, healthcare
|
||||
|
||||
### Testing Your Advantage
|
||||
|
||||
Ask:
|
||||
|
||||
- Can competitors copy this in < 2 years?
|
||||
- Does this matter to customers?
|
||||
- Do we execute this better than anyone?
|
||||
@@ -419,17 +458,20 @@ If "no" to any, it's not a sustainable advantage.
|
||||
### What to Track
|
||||
|
||||
**Product Changes:**
|
||||
|
||||
- New features
|
||||
- Pricing changes
|
||||
- Packaging adjustments
|
||||
|
||||
**Market Signals:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Funding announcements
|
||||
- Key hires (especially leadership)
|
||||
- Customer wins/losses
|
||||
- Partnerships
|
||||
|
||||
**Performance Metrics:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Revenue (if public or disclosed)
|
||||
- Customer count
|
||||
- Growth rate
|
||||
@@ -438,28 +480,34 @@ If "no" to any, it's not a sustainable advantage.
|
||||
### Monitoring Cadence
|
||||
|
||||
**Weekly:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Product release notes
|
||||
- News mentions
|
||||
|
||||
**Monthly:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Win/loss analysis review
|
||||
- Positioning map updates
|
||||
|
||||
**Quarterly:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Deep competitive review
|
||||
- Strategy adjustment
|
||||
|
||||
**Annually:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Major strategy reassessment
|
||||
- Market trends analysis
|
||||
|
||||
## Additional Resources
|
||||
|
||||
### Reference Files
|
||||
|
||||
- **`references/frameworks-deep-dive.md`** - Detailed application of each framework with worksheets
|
||||
- **`references/intel-sources.md`** - Comprehensive list of competitive intelligence sources
|
||||
|
||||
### Example Files
|
||||
|
||||
- **`examples/competitor-analysis.md`** - Complete competitive analysis for a SaaS startup
|
||||
- **`examples/positioning-workshop.md`** - Step-by-step positioning development process
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user