mirror of
https://github.com/wshobson/agents.git
synced 2026-03-18 09:37:15 +00:00
style: format all files with prettier
This commit is contained in:
@@ -17,18 +17,21 @@ Market sizing provides the foundation for startup strategy, fundraising, and bus
|
||||
### The Three-Tier Market Framework
|
||||
|
||||
**TAM (Total Addressable Market)**
|
||||
|
||||
- Total revenue opportunity if achieving 100% market share
|
||||
- Defines the universe of potential customers
|
||||
- Used for long-term vision and market validation
|
||||
- Example: All email marketing software revenue globally
|
||||
|
||||
**SAM (Serviceable Available Market)**
|
||||
|
||||
- Portion of TAM targetable with current product/service
|
||||
- Accounts for geographic, segment, or capability constraints
|
||||
- Represents realistic addressable opportunity
|
||||
- Example: AI-powered email marketing for e-commerce in North America
|
||||
|
||||
**SOM (Serviceable Obtainable Market)**
|
||||
|
||||
- Realistic market share achievable in 3-5 years
|
||||
- Accounts for competition, resources, and market dynamics
|
||||
- Used for financial projections and fundraising
|
||||
@@ -37,18 +40,21 @@ Market sizing provides the foundation for startup strategy, fundraising, and bus
|
||||
### When to Use Each Methodology
|
||||
|
||||
**Top-Down Analysis**
|
||||
|
||||
- Use when established market research exists
|
||||
- Best for mature, well-defined markets
|
||||
- Validates market existence and growth
|
||||
- Starts with industry reports and narrows down
|
||||
|
||||
**Bottom-Up Analysis**
|
||||
|
||||
- Use when targeting specific customer segments
|
||||
- Best for new or niche markets
|
||||
- Most credible for investors
|
||||
- Builds from customer data and pricing
|
||||
|
||||
**Value Theory**
|
||||
|
||||
- Use when creating new market categories
|
||||
- Best for disruptive innovations
|
||||
- Estimates based on value creation
|
||||
@@ -61,12 +67,14 @@ Market sizing provides the foundation for startup strategy, fundraising, and bus
|
||||
Start with total market size and narrow to addressable segments.
|
||||
|
||||
**Process:**
|
||||
|
||||
1. Identify total market category from research reports
|
||||
2. Apply geographic filters (target regions)
|
||||
3. Apply segment filters (target industries/customers)
|
||||
4. Calculate competitive positioning adjustments
|
||||
|
||||
**Formula:**
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
TAM = Total Market Category Size
|
||||
SAM = TAM × Geographic % × Segment %
|
||||
@@ -84,12 +92,14 @@ SOM = SAM × Realistic Capture Rate (2-5%)
|
||||
Build market size from customer segment calculations.
|
||||
|
||||
**Process:**
|
||||
|
||||
1. Define target customer segments
|
||||
2. Estimate number of potential customers per segment
|
||||
3. Determine average revenue per customer
|
||||
4. Calculate realistic penetration rates
|
||||
|
||||
**Formula:**
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
TAM = Σ (Segment Size × Annual Revenue per Customer)
|
||||
SAM = TAM × (Segments You Can Serve / Total Segments)
|
||||
@@ -107,6 +117,7 @@ SOM = SAM × Realistic Penetration Rate (Year 3-5)
|
||||
Calculate based on value created and willingness to pay.
|
||||
|
||||
**Process:**
|
||||
|
||||
1. Identify problem being solved
|
||||
2. Quantify current cost of problem (time, money, inefficiency)
|
||||
3. Calculate value of solution (savings, gains, efficiency)
|
||||
@@ -114,6 +125,7 @@ Calculate based on value created and willingness to pay.
|
||||
5. Multiply by addressable customer base
|
||||
|
||||
**Formula:**
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
Value per Customer = Problem Cost × % Solved by Solution
|
||||
Price per Customer = Value × Willingness to Pay % (10-30%)
|
||||
@@ -135,6 +147,7 @@ SOM = SAM × Realistic Adoption Rate
|
||||
Clearly specify what market is being measured.
|
||||
|
||||
**Questions to answer:**
|
||||
|
||||
- What problem is being solved?
|
||||
- Who are the target customers?
|
||||
- What's the product/service category?
|
||||
@@ -142,6 +155,7 @@ Clearly specify what market is being measured.
|
||||
- What's the time horizon?
|
||||
|
||||
**Example:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Problem: E-commerce companies struggle with email marketing automation
|
||||
- Customers: E-commerce stores with >$1M annual revenue
|
||||
- Category: AI-powered email marketing software
|
||||
@@ -153,12 +167,14 @@ Clearly specify what market is being measured.
|
||||
Identify credible data for calculations.
|
||||
|
||||
**Top-Down Sources:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Industry research reports (Gartner, Forrester, IDC)
|
||||
- Government statistics (Census, BLS, trade associations)
|
||||
- Public company filings and earnings
|
||||
- Market research firms (Statista, CB Insights, PitchBook)
|
||||
|
||||
**Bottom-Up Sources:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Customer interviews and surveys
|
||||
- Sales data and CRM records
|
||||
- Industry databases (LinkedIn, ZoomInfo, Crunchbase)
|
||||
@@ -166,6 +182,7 @@ Identify credible data for calculations.
|
||||
- Academic research
|
||||
|
||||
**Value Theory Sources:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Customer problem quantification
|
||||
- Time/cost studies
|
||||
- ROI case studies
|
||||
@@ -176,18 +193,21 @@ Identify credible data for calculations.
|
||||
Apply chosen methodology to determine total market.
|
||||
|
||||
**For Top-Down:**
|
||||
|
||||
1. Find total category size from research
|
||||
2. Document data source and year
|
||||
3. Apply growth rate if needed
|
||||
4. Validate with multiple sources
|
||||
|
||||
**For Bottom-Up:**
|
||||
|
||||
1. Count total potential customers
|
||||
2. Calculate average annual revenue per customer
|
||||
3. Multiply to get TAM
|
||||
4. Break down by segment
|
||||
|
||||
**For Value Theory:**
|
||||
|
||||
1. Quantify total addressable customer base
|
||||
2. Calculate value per customer
|
||||
3. Estimate pricing based on value
|
||||
@@ -198,6 +218,7 @@ Apply chosen methodology to determine total market.
|
||||
Narrow TAM to serviceable addressable market.
|
||||
|
||||
**Apply Filters:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Geographic constraints (regions you can serve)
|
||||
- Product limitations (features you currently have)
|
||||
- Customer requirements (size, industry, use case)
|
||||
@@ -205,11 +226,13 @@ Narrow TAM to serviceable addressable market.
|
||||
- Regulatory or compliance restrictions
|
||||
|
||||
**Formula:**
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
SAM = TAM × (% matching all filters)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Example:**
|
||||
|
||||
- TAM: $10B global email marketing
|
||||
- Geographic filter: 40% (North America)
|
||||
- Product filter: 30% (e-commerce focus)
|
||||
@@ -221,6 +244,7 @@ SAM = TAM × (% matching all filters)
|
||||
Determine realistic obtainable market share.
|
||||
|
||||
**Consider:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Current market share of competitors
|
||||
- Typical market share for new entrants (2-5%)
|
||||
- Resources available (funding, team, time)
|
||||
@@ -229,12 +253,14 @@ Determine realistic obtainable market share.
|
||||
- Time to achieve (3-5 years typically)
|
||||
|
||||
**Conservative Approach:**
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
SOM (Year 3) = SAM × 2%
|
||||
SOM (Year 5) = SAM × 5%
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Example:**
|
||||
|
||||
- SAM: $720M
|
||||
- Year 3 SOM: $720M × 2% = $14.4M
|
||||
- Year 5 SOM: $720M × 5% = $36M
|
||||
@@ -244,6 +270,7 @@ SOM (Year 5) = SAM × 5%
|
||||
Cross-check using multiple methods.
|
||||
|
||||
**Validation Techniques:**
|
||||
|
||||
1. Compare top-down and bottom-up results (should be within 30%)
|
||||
2. Check against public company revenues in space
|
||||
3. Validate customer count assumptions
|
||||
@@ -252,6 +279,7 @@ Cross-check using multiple methods.
|
||||
6. Compare to similar market categories
|
||||
|
||||
**Red Flags:**
|
||||
|
||||
- TAM that's too small (< $1B for VC-backed startups)
|
||||
- TAM that's too large (unsupported by data)
|
||||
- SOM that's too aggressive (> 10% in 5 years for new entrant)
|
||||
@@ -262,12 +290,14 @@ Cross-check using multiple methods.
|
||||
### SaaS Markets
|
||||
|
||||
**Key Metrics:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Number of potential businesses in target segment
|
||||
- Average contract value (ACV)
|
||||
- Typical market penetration rates
|
||||
- Expansion revenue potential
|
||||
|
||||
**TAM Calculation:**
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
TAM = Total Target Companies × Average ACV × (1 + Expansion Rate)
|
||||
```
|
||||
@@ -275,11 +305,13 @@ TAM = Total Target Companies × Average ACV × (1 + Expansion Rate)
|
||||
### Marketplace Markets
|
||||
|
||||
**Key Metrics:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Gross Merchandise Value (GMV) of category
|
||||
- Take rate (% of GMV you capture)
|
||||
- Total transactions or users
|
||||
|
||||
**TAM Calculation:**
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
TAM = Total Category GMV × Expected Take Rate
|
||||
```
|
||||
@@ -287,11 +319,13 @@ TAM = Total Category GMV × Expected Take Rate
|
||||
### Consumer Markets
|
||||
|
||||
**Key Metrics:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Total addressable users/households
|
||||
- Average revenue per user (ARPU)
|
||||
- Engagement frequency
|
||||
|
||||
**TAM Calculation:**
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
TAM = Total Users × ARPU × Purchase Frequency per Year
|
||||
```
|
||||
@@ -299,11 +333,13 @@ TAM = Total Users × ARPU × Purchase Frequency per Year
|
||||
### B2B Services
|
||||
|
||||
**Key Metrics:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Number of target companies by size/industry
|
||||
- Average project value or retainer
|
||||
- Typical buying frequency
|
||||
|
||||
**TAM Calculation:**
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
TAM = Total Target Companies × Average Deal Size × Deals per Year
|
||||
```
|
||||
@@ -313,6 +349,7 @@ TAM = Total Target Companies × Average Deal Size × Deals per Year
|
||||
### For Investors
|
||||
|
||||
**Structure:**
|
||||
|
||||
1. Market definition and problem scope
|
||||
2. TAM/SAM/SOM with methodology
|
||||
3. Data sources and assumptions
|
||||
@@ -320,6 +357,7 @@ TAM = Total Target Companies × Average Deal Size × Deals per Year
|
||||
5. Competitive landscape context
|
||||
|
||||
**Key Points:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Lead with bottom-up calculation (most credible)
|
||||
- Show triangulation with top-down
|
||||
- Explain conservative assumptions
|
||||
@@ -329,6 +367,7 @@ TAM = Total Target Companies × Average Deal Size × Deals per Year
|
||||
### For Strategy
|
||||
|
||||
**Structure:**
|
||||
|
||||
1. Addressable customer segments
|
||||
2. Prioritization by opportunity size
|
||||
3. Entry strategy by segment
|
||||
@@ -336,6 +375,7 @@ TAM = Total Target Companies × Average Deal Size × Deals per Year
|
||||
5. Resource requirements
|
||||
|
||||
**Key Points:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Focus on SAM and SOM
|
||||
- Show segment-level detail
|
||||
- Connect to go-to-market plan
|
||||
@@ -345,26 +385,31 @@ TAM = Total Target Companies × Average Deal Size × Deals per Year
|
||||
## Common Mistakes to Avoid
|
||||
|
||||
**Mistake 1: Confusing TAM with SAM**
|
||||
|
||||
- Don't claim entire market as addressable
|
||||
- Apply realistic product/geographic constraints
|
||||
- Be honest about serviceable market
|
||||
|
||||
**Mistake 2: Overly Aggressive SOM**
|
||||
|
||||
- New entrants rarely capture > 5% in 5 years
|
||||
- Account for competition and resources
|
||||
- Show realistic ramp timeline
|
||||
|
||||
**Mistake 3: Using Only Top-Down**
|
||||
|
||||
- Investors prefer bottom-up validation
|
||||
- Top-down alone lacks credibility
|
||||
- Always triangulate with multiple methods
|
||||
|
||||
**Mistake 4: Cherry-Picking Data**
|
||||
|
||||
- Use consistent, recent data sources
|
||||
- Don't mix methodologies inappropriately
|
||||
- Document all assumptions clearly
|
||||
|
||||
**Mistake 5: Ignoring Market Dynamics**
|
||||
|
||||
- Account for market growth/decline
|
||||
- Consider competitive intensity
|
||||
- Factor in switching costs and barriers
|
||||
@@ -374,6 +419,7 @@ TAM = Total Target Companies × Average Deal Size × Deals per Year
|
||||
### Reference Files
|
||||
|
||||
For detailed methodologies and frameworks:
|
||||
|
||||
- **`references/methodology-deep-dive.md`** - Comprehensive guide to each methodology with step-by-step worksheets
|
||||
- **`references/data-sources.md`** - Curated list of market research sources, databases, and tools
|
||||
- **`references/industry-templates.md`** - Specific templates for SaaS, marketplace, consumer, B2B, and fintech markets
|
||||
@@ -381,6 +427,7 @@ For detailed methodologies and frameworks:
|
||||
### Example Files
|
||||
|
||||
Working examples with complete calculations:
|
||||
|
||||
- **`examples/saas-market-sizing.md`** - Complete TAM/SAM/SOM for a B2B SaaS product
|
||||
- **`examples/marketplace-sizing.md`** - Marketplace platform market opportunity calculation
|
||||
- **`examples/value-theory-example.md`** - Value-based market sizing for disruptive innovation
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user