Files
agents/tools/multi-agent-review.md
Seth Hobson d2f3886ae1 Consolidate workflows and tools from commands repository
Repository Restructure:
- Move all 83 agent .md files to agents/ subdirectory
- Add 15 workflow orchestrators from commands repo to workflows/
- Add 42 development tools from commands repo to tools/
- Update README for unified repository structure

The commands repository functionality is now fully integrated, providing
complete workflow orchestration and development tooling alongside agents.

Directory Structure:
- agents/    - 83 specialized AI agents
- workflows/ - 15 multi-agent orchestration commands
- tools/     - 42 focused development utilities

No breaking changes to agent functionality - all agents remain accessible
with same names and behavior. Adds workflow and tool commands for enhanced
multi-agent coordination capabilities.
2025-10-08 08:28:33 -04:00

2.3 KiB

model
model
claude-sonnet-4-0

Perform comprehensive multi-agent code review with specialized reviewers:

[Extended thinking: This tool command invokes multiple review-focused agents to provide different perspectives on code quality, security, and architecture. Each agent reviews independently, then findings are consolidated.]

Review Process

1. Code Quality Review

Use Task tool with subagent_type="code-reviewer" to examine:

  • Code style and readability
  • Adherence to SOLID principles
  • Design patterns and anti-patterns
  • Code duplication and complexity
  • Documentation completeness
  • Test coverage and quality

Prompt: "Perform detailed code review of: $ARGUMENTS. Focus on maintainability, readability, and best practices. Provide specific line-by-line feedback where appropriate."

2. Security Review

Use Task tool with subagent_type="security-auditor" to check:

  • Authentication and authorization flaws
  • Input validation and sanitization
  • SQL injection and XSS vulnerabilities
  • Sensitive data exposure
  • Security misconfigurations
  • Dependency vulnerabilities

Prompt: "Conduct security review of: $ARGUMENTS. Identify vulnerabilities, security risks, and OWASP compliance issues. Provide severity ratings and remediation steps."

3. Architecture Review

Use Task tool with subagent_type="architect-reviewer" to evaluate:

  • Service boundaries and coupling
  • Scalability considerations
  • Design pattern appropriateness
  • Technology choices
  • API design quality
  • Data flow and dependencies

Prompt: "Review architecture and design of: $ARGUMENTS. Evaluate scalability, maintainability, and architectural patterns. Identify potential bottlenecks and design improvements."

Consolidated Review Output

After all agents complete their reviews, consolidate findings into:

  1. Critical Issues - Must fix before merge

    • Security vulnerabilities
    • Broken functionality
    • Major architectural flaws
  2. Important Issues - Should fix soon

    • Performance problems
    • Code quality issues
    • Missing tests
  3. Minor Issues - Nice to fix

    • Style inconsistencies
    • Documentation gaps
    • Refactoring opportunities
  4. Positive Findings - Good practices to highlight

    • Well-designed components
    • Good test coverage
    • Security best practices

Target for review: $ARGUMENTS