Repository Restructure: - Move all 83 agent .md files to agents/ subdirectory - Add 15 workflow orchestrators from commands repo to workflows/ - Add 42 development tools from commands repo to tools/ - Update README for unified repository structure The commands repository functionality is now fully integrated, providing complete workflow orchestration and development tooling alongside agents. Directory Structure: - agents/ - 83 specialized AI agents - workflows/ - 15 multi-agent orchestration commands - tools/ - 42 focused development utilities No breaking changes to agent functionality - all agents remain accessible with same names and behavior. Adds workflow and tool commands for enhanced multi-agent coordination capabilities.
2.3 KiB
model
| model |
|---|
| claude-sonnet-4-0 |
Perform comprehensive multi-agent code review with specialized reviewers:
[Extended thinking: This tool command invokes multiple review-focused agents to provide different perspectives on code quality, security, and architecture. Each agent reviews independently, then findings are consolidated.]
Review Process
1. Code Quality Review
Use Task tool with subagent_type="code-reviewer" to examine:
- Code style and readability
- Adherence to SOLID principles
- Design patterns and anti-patterns
- Code duplication and complexity
- Documentation completeness
- Test coverage and quality
Prompt: "Perform detailed code review of: $ARGUMENTS. Focus on maintainability, readability, and best practices. Provide specific line-by-line feedback where appropriate."
2. Security Review
Use Task tool with subagent_type="security-auditor" to check:
- Authentication and authorization flaws
- Input validation and sanitization
- SQL injection and XSS vulnerabilities
- Sensitive data exposure
- Security misconfigurations
- Dependency vulnerabilities
Prompt: "Conduct security review of: $ARGUMENTS. Identify vulnerabilities, security risks, and OWASP compliance issues. Provide severity ratings and remediation steps."
3. Architecture Review
Use Task tool with subagent_type="architect-reviewer" to evaluate:
- Service boundaries and coupling
- Scalability considerations
- Design pattern appropriateness
- Technology choices
- API design quality
- Data flow and dependencies
Prompt: "Review architecture and design of: $ARGUMENTS. Evaluate scalability, maintainability, and architectural patterns. Identify potential bottlenecks and design improvements."
Consolidated Review Output
After all agents complete their reviews, consolidate findings into:
-
Critical Issues - Must fix before merge
- Security vulnerabilities
- Broken functionality
- Major architectural flaws
-
Important Issues - Should fix soon
- Performance problems
- Code quality issues
- Missing tests
-
Minor Issues - Nice to fix
- Style inconsistencies
- Documentation gaps
- Refactoring opportunities
-
Positive Findings - Good practices to highlight
- Well-designed components
- Good test coverage
- Security best practices
Target for review: $ARGUMENTS