Consolidate workflows and tools from commands repository

Repository Restructure:
- Move all 83 agent .md files to agents/ subdirectory
- Add 15 workflow orchestrators from commands repo to workflows/
- Add 42 development tools from commands repo to tools/
- Update README for unified repository structure

The commands repository functionality is now fully integrated, providing
complete workflow orchestration and development tooling alongside agents.

Directory Structure:
- agents/    - 83 specialized AI agents
- workflows/ - 15 multi-agent orchestration commands
- tools/     - 42 focused development utilities

No breaking changes to agent functionality - all agents remain accessible
with same names and behavior. Adds workflow and tool commands for enhanced
multi-agent coordination capabilities.
This commit is contained in:
Seth Hobson
2025-10-08 08:25:17 -04:00
parent a80cfd0f53
commit d2f3886ae1
143 changed files with 37154 additions and 464 deletions

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,68 @@
---
model: claude-sonnet-4-0
---
Perform comprehensive multi-agent code review with specialized reviewers:
[Extended thinking: This tool command invokes multiple review-focused agents to provide different perspectives on code quality, security, and architecture. Each agent reviews independently, then findings are consolidated.]
## Review Process
### 1. Code Quality Review
Use Task tool with subagent_type="code-reviewer" to examine:
- Code style and readability
- Adherence to SOLID principles
- Design patterns and anti-patterns
- Code duplication and complexity
- Documentation completeness
- Test coverage and quality
Prompt: "Perform detailed code review of: $ARGUMENTS. Focus on maintainability, readability, and best practices. Provide specific line-by-line feedback where appropriate."
### 2. Security Review
Use Task tool with subagent_type="security-auditor" to check:
- Authentication and authorization flaws
- Input validation and sanitization
- SQL injection and XSS vulnerabilities
- Sensitive data exposure
- Security misconfigurations
- Dependency vulnerabilities
Prompt: "Conduct security review of: $ARGUMENTS. Identify vulnerabilities, security risks, and OWASP compliance issues. Provide severity ratings and remediation steps."
### 3. Architecture Review
Use Task tool with subagent_type="architect-reviewer" to evaluate:
- Service boundaries and coupling
- Scalability considerations
- Design pattern appropriateness
- Technology choices
- API design quality
- Data flow and dependencies
Prompt: "Review architecture and design of: $ARGUMENTS. Evaluate scalability, maintainability, and architectural patterns. Identify potential bottlenecks and design improvements."
## Consolidated Review Output
After all agents complete their reviews, consolidate findings into:
1. **Critical Issues** - Must fix before merge
- Security vulnerabilities
- Broken functionality
- Major architectural flaws
2. **Important Issues** - Should fix soon
- Performance problems
- Code quality issues
- Missing tests
3. **Minor Issues** - Nice to fix
- Style inconsistencies
- Documentation gaps
- Refactoring opportunities
4. **Positive Findings** - Good practices to highlight
- Well-designed components
- Good test coverage
- Security best practices
Target for review: $ARGUMENTS