mirror of
https://github.com/wshobson/agents.git
synced 2026-03-18 17:47:16 +00:00
0752775afc
New plugin with 7 presets (review, debug, feature, fullstack, research, security, migration), 4 specialized agents, 7 slash commands, 6 skills with reference docs, and Context7 MCP integration for research teams.
79 lines
2.8 KiB
Markdown
79 lines
2.8 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
description: "Launch a multi-reviewer parallel code review with specialized review dimensions"
|
|
argument-hint: "<target> [--reviewers security,performance,architecture,testing,accessibility] [--base-branch main]"
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Team Review
|
|
|
|
Orchestrate a multi-reviewer parallel code review where each reviewer focuses on a specific quality dimension. Produces a consolidated, deduplicated report organized by severity.
|
|
|
|
## Pre-flight Checks
|
|
|
|
1. Verify `CLAUDE_CODE_EXPERIMENTAL_AGENT_TEAMS=1` is set
|
|
2. Parse `$ARGUMENTS`:
|
|
- `<target>`: file path, directory, git diff range (e.g., `main...HEAD`), or PR number (e.g., `#123`)
|
|
- `--reviewers`: comma-separated dimensions (default: `security,performance,architecture`)
|
|
- `--base-branch`: base branch for diff comparison (default: `main`)
|
|
|
|
## Phase 1: Target Resolution
|
|
|
|
1. Determine target type:
|
|
- **File/Directory**: Use as-is for review scope
|
|
- **Git diff range**: Use Bash to run `git diff {range} --name-only` to get changed files
|
|
- **PR number**: Use Bash to run `gh pr diff {number} --name-only` to get changed files
|
|
2. Collect the full diff content for distribution to reviewers
|
|
3. Display review scope to user: "{N} files to review across {M} dimensions"
|
|
|
|
## Phase 2: Team Spawn
|
|
|
|
1. Use `Teammate` tool with `operation: "spawnTeam"`, team name: `review-{timestamp}`
|
|
2. For each requested dimension, use `Task` tool to spawn a teammate:
|
|
- `name`: `{dimension}-reviewer` (e.g., "security-reviewer")
|
|
- `subagent_type`: "agent-teams:team-reviewer"
|
|
- `prompt`: Include the dimension assignment, target files, and diff content
|
|
3. Use `TaskCreate` for each reviewer's task:
|
|
- Subject: "Review {target} for {dimension} issues"
|
|
- Description: Include file list, diff content, and dimension-specific checklist
|
|
|
|
## Phase 3: Monitor and Collect
|
|
|
|
1. Wait for all review tasks to complete (check `TaskList` periodically)
|
|
2. As each reviewer completes, collect their structured findings
|
|
3. Track progress: "{completed}/{total} reviews complete"
|
|
|
|
## Phase 4: Consolidation
|
|
|
|
1. **Deduplicate**: Merge findings that reference the same file:line location
|
|
2. **Resolve conflicts**: If reviewers disagree on severity, use the higher rating
|
|
3. **Organize by severity**: Group findings as Critical, High, Medium, Low
|
|
4. **Cross-reference**: Note findings that appear in multiple dimensions
|
|
|
|
## Phase 5: Report and Cleanup
|
|
|
|
1. Present consolidated report:
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
## Code Review Report: {target}
|
|
|
|
Reviewed by: {dimensions}
|
|
Files reviewed: {count}
|
|
|
|
### Critical ({count})
|
|
[findings...]
|
|
|
|
### High ({count})
|
|
[findings...]
|
|
|
|
### Medium ({count})
|
|
[findings...]
|
|
|
|
### Low ({count})
|
|
[findings...]
|
|
|
|
### Summary
|
|
Total findings: {count} (Critical: N, High: N, Medium: N, Low: N)
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
2. Send `shutdown_request` to all reviewers
|
|
3. Call `Teammate` cleanup to remove team resources
|