mirror of
https://github.com/wshobson/agents.git
synced 2026-03-18 09:37:15 +00:00
120 lines
5.9 KiB
Markdown
120 lines
5.9 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
name: team-composition-patterns
|
|
description: Design optimal agent team compositions with sizing heuristics, preset configurations, and agent type selection. Use this skill when deciding team size, selecting agent types, or configuring team presets for multi-agent workflows.
|
|
version: 1.0.2
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Team Composition Patterns
|
|
|
|
Best practices for composing multi-agent teams, selecting team sizes, choosing agent types, and configuring display modes for Claude Code's Agent Teams feature.
|
|
|
|
## When to Use This Skill
|
|
|
|
- Deciding how many teammates to spawn for a task
|
|
- Choosing between preset team configurations
|
|
- Selecting the right agent type (subagent_type) for each role
|
|
- Configuring teammate display modes (tmux, iTerm2, in-process)
|
|
- Building custom team compositions for non-standard workflows
|
|
|
|
## Team Sizing Heuristics
|
|
|
|
| Complexity | Team Size | When to Use |
|
|
| ------------ | --------- | ----------------------------------------------------------- |
|
|
| Simple | 1-2 | Single-dimension review, isolated bug, small feature |
|
|
| Moderate | 2-3 | Multi-file changes, 2-3 concerns, medium features |
|
|
| Complex | 3-4 | Cross-cutting concerns, large features, deep debugging |
|
|
| Very Complex | 4-5 | Full-stack features, comprehensive reviews, systemic issues |
|
|
|
|
**Rule of thumb**: Start with the smallest team that covers all required dimensions. Adding teammates increases coordination overhead.
|
|
|
|
## Preset Team Compositions
|
|
|
|
### Review Team
|
|
|
|
- **Size**: 3 reviewers
|
|
- **Agents**: 3x `team-reviewer`
|
|
- **Default dimensions**: security, performance, architecture
|
|
- **Use when**: Code changes need multi-dimensional quality assessment
|
|
|
|
### Debug Team
|
|
|
|
- **Size**: 3 investigators
|
|
- **Agents**: 3x `team-debugger`
|
|
- **Default hypotheses**: 3 competing hypotheses
|
|
- **Use when**: Bug has multiple plausible root causes
|
|
|
|
### Feature Team
|
|
|
|
- **Size**: 3 (1 lead + 2 implementers)
|
|
- **Agents**: 1x `team-lead` + 2x `team-implementer`
|
|
- **Use when**: Feature can be decomposed into parallel work streams
|
|
|
|
### Fullstack Team
|
|
|
|
- **Size**: 4 (1 lead + 3 implementers)
|
|
- **Agents**: 1x `team-lead` + 1x frontend `team-implementer` + 1x backend `team-implementer` + 1x test `team-implementer`
|
|
- **Use when**: Feature spans frontend, backend, and test layers
|
|
|
|
### Research Team
|
|
|
|
- **Size**: 3 researchers
|
|
- **Agents**: 3x `general-purpose`
|
|
- **Default areas**: Each assigned a different research question, module, or topic
|
|
- **Capabilities**: Codebase search (Grep, Glob, Read), web search (WebSearch, WebFetch)
|
|
- **Use when**: Need to understand a codebase, research libraries, compare approaches, or gather information from code and web sources in parallel
|
|
|
|
### Security Team
|
|
|
|
- **Size**: 4 reviewers
|
|
- **Agents**: 4x `team-reviewer`
|
|
- **Default dimensions**: OWASP/vulnerabilities, auth/access control, dependencies/supply chain, secrets/configuration
|
|
- **Use when**: Comprehensive security audit covering multiple attack surfaces
|
|
|
|
### Migration Team
|
|
|
|
- **Size**: 4 (1 lead + 2 implementers + 1 reviewer)
|
|
- **Agents**: 1x `team-lead` + 2x `team-implementer` + 1x `team-reviewer`
|
|
- **Use when**: Large codebase migration (framework upgrade, language port, API version bump) requiring parallel work with correctness verification
|
|
|
|
## Agent Type Selection
|
|
|
|
When spawning teammates with the Task tool, choose `subagent_type` based on what tools the teammate needs:
|
|
|
|
| Agent Type | Tools Available | Use For |
|
|
| ------------------------------ | ----------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------- |
|
|
| `general-purpose` | All tools (Read, Write, Edit, Bash, etc.) | Implementation, debugging, any task requiring file changes |
|
|
| `Explore` | Read-only tools (Read, Grep, Glob) | Research, code exploration, analysis |
|
|
| `Plan` | Read-only tools | Architecture planning, task decomposition |
|
|
| `agent-teams:team-reviewer` | All tools | Code review with structured findings |
|
|
| `agent-teams:team-debugger` | All tools | Hypothesis-driven investigation |
|
|
| `agent-teams:team-implementer` | All tools | Building features within file ownership boundaries |
|
|
| `agent-teams:team-lead` | All tools | Team orchestration and coordination |
|
|
|
|
**Key distinction**: Read-only agents (Explore, Plan) cannot modify files. Never assign implementation tasks to read-only agents.
|
|
|
|
## Display Mode Configuration
|
|
|
|
Configure in `~/.claude/settings.json`:
|
|
|
|
```json
|
|
{
|
|
"teammateMode": "tmux"
|
|
}
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
| Mode | Behavior | Best For |
|
|
| -------------- | ------------------------------ | ------------------------------------------------- |
|
|
| `"tmux"` | Each teammate in a tmux pane | Development workflows, monitoring multiple agents |
|
|
| `"iterm2"` | Each teammate in an iTerm2 tab | macOS users who prefer iTerm2 |
|
|
| `"in-process"` | All teammates in same process | Simple tasks, CI/CD environments |
|
|
|
|
## Custom Team Guidelines
|
|
|
|
When building custom teams:
|
|
|
|
1. **Every team needs a coordinator** — Either designate a `team-lead` or have the user coordinate directly
|
|
2. **Match roles to agent types** — Use specialized agents (reviewer, debugger, implementer) when available
|
|
3. **Avoid duplicate roles** — Two agents doing the same thing wastes resources
|
|
4. **Define boundaries upfront** — Each teammate needs clear ownership of files or responsibilities
|
|
5. **Keep it small** — 2-4 teammates is the sweet spot; 5+ requires significant coordination overhead
|